Modification History
Release |
TP Version |
Comments |
3 |
PSP12V1 |
Unit descriptor edited. |
2 |
PSP04V4.2 |
Layout adjusted. No changes to content. |
1 |
PSP04V4.1 |
Primary release. |
Unit Descriptor
This unit covers the collection of data from a wide variety of sources and its input into appropriate data management systems for interrogation to identify indicators of fraud and corruption. It includes collating and interrogating data and monitoring for indicators of fraud and corruption.
Fraud in the unit title incorporates both fraud and corruption.
In practice, monitoring data for indicators of fraud and corruption may overlap with other generalist or specialist public sector workplace activities such as acting ethically, complying with legislation, exercising regulatory powers, etc.
Related units of competency dealing with investigation, evidence, powers of arrest, etc are located in the Regulatory Competency field of the Training Package.
No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication
Application of the Unit
Not applicable.
Licensing/Regulatory Information
Not applicable.
Pre-Requisites
Not applicable.
Employability Skills Information
This unit contains employability skills.
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
Elements are the essential outcomes of the unit of competency. |
Together, performance criteria specify the requirements for competent performance. Text in bold italics is explained in the Range Statement following. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1 . Collate data |
1.1 Relevant data sources are identified and data is collected that is compatible, useful, relevant, reliable, valid and timely. 1.2 Data is organised in prescribed form in accordance with the identified information needs and uses. 1.3 Data is checked for accuracy, suitability and compliance with legal and privacy responsibilities and security. 1.4 The need to liaise with specialists is determined and acted on in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. 1.5 Ways to improve fraud and corruption control data content, interfaces and usefulness are monitored, and recommendations are made to supervisors and other stakeholders . |
2 . Interrogate data |
2.1 Quantitative and/or qualitative analyses are performed to obtain required outcomes in accordance with the purpose of each analysis. 2.2 Analysis and description tools and techniques are selected appropriate to the nature of the information and the required outcome. 2.3 Priority of data to be interrogated is determined in consultation with appropriate people, and work is organised accordingly. 2.4 An understanding of the nature of the program or activity from which the data is obtained, the way in which the information is structured in the system and the likely indications of fraud and corruption activities are reflected in the analysis of material. 2.5 Preliminary recommendations are expressed in the detail, format and timeframe required. |
3 . Monitor for indicators of fraud and corruption |
3.1 Fraud and corruption or possible fraud and corruption situations are identified, staff and systems alerted and actions initiated. 3.2 Where indicators arise for which there are no precedents, information is referred to the appropriate people for further analysis. 3.3 Trends indicating activities outside control limits are reported for further analysis and investigation. 3.4 Checks are made for internal consistency and compliance with established structure, rules and authorities for accessing information. 3.5 Variations from standards and guidelines are reported in accordance with organisational policy and procedures. |
Required Skills and Knowledge
This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
Skill requirements Look for evidence that confirms skills in:
|
Knowledge requirements Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:
|
Evidence Guide
EVIDENCE GUIDE |
|
The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package. |
|
Units to be assessed together |
|
Overview of evidence requirements |
In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:
|
Resources required to carry out assessment |
These resources include:
|
Where and how to assess evidence |
Valid assessment of this unit requires:
Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:
Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:
|
For consistency of assessment |
Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and/or apply the competency in different situations or environments. |
Range Statement
The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here. |
|
Data may include: |
|
Stakeholders may include: |
|
Purposes of data analysis may include: |
|
Actions resulting from data interrogation may include: |
|
Guidelines may include: |
|
Unit Sector(s)
Not applicable.
Competency field
Fraud Control.