Modification History
Not applicable.
Unit Descriptor
Unit Descriptor |
This unit covers the competency required to manage quick assessment (QA) inquiries and to make administrative decisions in accordance with administrative law, policies and procedures. In the context of this unit, administrative decisions are those that may adversely affect member's rights, interests and expectations and that are within the discretion of the commanding officer (CO) to make. |
Application of the Unit
Application of the Unit |
This unit applies normally to Defence members who have been given command, either as an automatic consequence of appointment, or by an instrument of appointment, as a CO or as an administrative CO; in some circumstances it is by rank only, irrespective of the position held. |
Licensing/Regulatory Information
Not applicable.
Pre-Requisites
Not applicable.
Employability Skills Information
Employability Skills |
This unit contains employability skills. |
Pre-requisite Unit /s |
Nil |
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
Elements describe the essential outcomes of a Unit of Competency. |
Performance Criteria describe the required performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the Required Skills and Knowledge and/or the Range Statement. Assessment of performance is to be consistent with the Evidence Guide. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Prepare for an administrative decision |
1.1 Initial action is determined following an initiator 1.2 Organisational policies and procedures are complied with 1.3 Quick assessment is instigated 1.4 Administrative sanction is initiated |
2. Make an administrative decision |
2.1 Factors are considered 2.2 Administrative decision is made in accordance with decision making criteria and policies 2.3 Stakeholders are informed of the decision and its reasons 2.4 Documentation is completed in accordance with organisational policies |
Required Skills and Knowledge
REQUIRED SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE |
This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
Required Skills |
|
Required Knowledge |
|
Evidence Guide
EVIDENCE GUIDE |
|
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the Performance Criteria, Required Skills and Knowledge, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package. |
|
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit |
Assessment must confirm the ability to:
Consistency in performance Competency should be demonstrated in a range of situations that could be expected in the workplace. |
Context of and specific resources for assessment |
Context of assessment Competency should be assessed in the workplace or in a simulated workplace environment. Specific resources for assessment There are no specific resource requirements for this unit. |
Method of assessment |
This unit may be assessed with the following unit/s:
In a public safety environment assessment is usually conducted via direct observation in a training environment or in the workplace via subject matter supervision and/or mentoring, which is typically recorded in a competency workbook. Assessment is completed using appropriately qualified assessors who select the most appropriate method of assessment. Assessment may occur in an operational environment or in an industry-approved simulated work environment. Forms of assessment that are typically used include:
|
Range Statement
RANGE STATEMENT |
|
The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below. |
|
Administrative decisions may include |
Applying administrative sanctions as an imposing authority (from a request and submission from an initiating authority) Approval to live beyond 30 km from position Dealing with a complaint or ROG Eligibility for higher duties allowance Granting leave (such as short-term, carer, parental, maternity, compassionate, long service, leave without pay, leave with holiday pay) Imposing a formal warning Member with dependents (unaccompanied) Recognising Interdependent relationships |
Initial actions may include |
Determining decision is not within power (jurisdiction) to make Determining whether the initiation has occurred within policy timeframes (for example, ROG for termination notice is submitted within fourteen days of notice issue, without exception) Making a decision on a simple issue for which sufficient information has been supplied (resolution by the CO) Making further examination of the issue Offering alternative dispute resolution processes Referring the matter to ADFIS and/or service police Referring the matter to a superior authority Taking no further action |
Initiator may include |
Complaint or ROG being made Incident occurring (for instance, an accident) Request being made Request for a review of a previous decision Request for a decision as an imposing authority is received from an initiating authority |
Organisational policies may include |
ADF publications Defence Instructions |
Instigating a QA may include |
Confirming issue is connected with the scope of the CO's command Determining need for a QA Selecting and briefing a QA officer Monitoring timeliness of assessment Considering next action upon receipt of QA brief |
Initiating administrative sanctions may include |
Issuing a Notice to Show Cause as the initiating authority Gathering evidence Gathering specialist and required reports Gathering statement of reasons from member Considering response in determining next action Monitoring timeliness of process Referring collated material to an imposing authority for a decision |
Factors may include |
Considering inquiry reports:
Evidence/facts provided in performance appraisal reports, records of conversation, other official documentation Matters raised in the member's response Policy relied upon Recommendations from subordinates/superiors Specialist advice (legal, psychological, medical) |
Decision making criteria include |
Applying policy but not inflexibly or without proper regard to the merits and circumstances of the matter Decision being reasonable Decision maker having the proper authority and jurisdiction (power) Decision maker not being biased (perceived and actual) Disregarding irrelevant factors while taking relevant considerations into account Making decision after a fair hearing Making decision while not under orders or dictation Sufficient evidence (balance of probabilities [Briginshaw v Briginshaw]) Seeking legal advice where necessary |
Unit Sector(s)
Not applicable.