Unit of competency details

Release 

TP Version 

Comments 

3

PSP12V1

Unit descriptor edited.

2

PSP04V4.2.

Layout adjusted. No changes to content.

1

PSP04V4.1

Primary release.

Elements are the essential outcomes of the unit of competency.

Together, performance criteria specify the requirements for competent performance. Text in bold italics   is explained in the Range Statement following.

ELEMENT 

PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 

1 . Establish security risk context 

1.1 Strategic  and organisational contexts  are confirmed in accordance with the organisation's security plan.

1.2 Stakeholders  are identified and their expectations and input are gathered in accordance with legislation, policy and procedures .

1.3 Security risk criteria  are identified from the security plan and confirmed as current and relevant.

1.4 Information and resources are obtained to conduct the risk  analysis in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.

2 . Identify security risk 

2.1 Sources of security risk  are identified and recorded in accordance with organisational policy and procedures.

2.2 Risks are identified using a specified methodology or tools  in accordance with the security plan.

2.3 Sources of risk are identified from the perspective of all stakeholders.

2.4 Stakeholders are consulted during the risk identification process to finalise a list of risks.

3 . Analyse security risk 

3.1 Threat assessments , current exposure  and current security arrangements are identified in accordance with the security plan to estimate the likelihood  of each risk event occurring.

3.2 Potential consequences  of each risk are determined in accordance with the security plan, including critical lead time for recovery .

3.3 Risk ratings  are determined, documented and communicated in accordance with the security plan and organisational standards.

3.4 A rationale for each risk rating is included in accordance with organisational requirements.

4 . Evaluate security risk 

4.1 Risks are assessed against the organisation's security risk criteria.

4.2 Risks are prioritised for treatment in accordance with the security plan.

4.3 Risks are monitored in accordance with the security plan until treatment measures have been implemented.

5 . Compile security risk register 

5.1 A security risk register  is developed that records identified risks, their nature and source.

5.2 The consequences and likelihood of risks, and the adequacy of existing controls are identified in the register.

5.3 Risk ratings are recorded for identified risks in accordance with organisational procedures.

5.4 The security risk register is compiled to meet organisational standards for content, format and presentation and reflects changes in circumstances.

5.5 Risk register is referred to management for decision on which risks will be accepted and which will require treatment.

This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit.

Skill requirements 

Look for evidence that confirms skills in:

• applying legislation, regulations and policies relating to government security management
• reading and analysing the organisation's security plan
• researching and critically analysing the operational environment and drawing conclusions
• using effective communication with diverse stakeholders involving listening, questioning, paraphrasing, clarifying, summarising
• responding to diversity, including gender and disability
• writing reports requiring formality of language and structure
• using computer technology to gather and analyse information, and prepare reports
• representing mathematical information in a range of formats to suit the information and the purpose
• applying procedures relating to occupational health and safety and environment in the context of government security management

Knowledge requirements 

Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:

• legislation, regulations, policies, procedures and guidelines relating to government security management such as:

• occupational health and safety
• public service Acts
• Crimes Act 1914 and Criminal Code 1985
• Freedom of Information Act 1982
• Privacy Act 1988
• fraud control policy
• protective security policy
• Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM)
• Protective Security Policy Framework
• risk analysis terminology and techniques
• the organisation's security plan
• the organisation's assets and security environment
• Australian standards, quality assurance and certification requirements
• AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management - Principles and Guidelines
• public sector legislation such as equal employment opportunity, and equity and diversity principles applied in the context of government security management

The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package.

Units to be assessed together 

• Pre-requisite units that must be achieved prior to this unit:Nil
• Co-requisite units that must be assessed with this unit:Nil
• Co-assessed units that may be assessed with this unit to increase the efficiency and realism of the assessment process include, but are not limited to:

• PSPETHC401A Uphold and support the values and principles of public service
• PSPGOV406B Gather and analyse information
• PSPGOV422A Apply government processes
• PSPLEGN401A Encourage compliance with legislation in the public sector
• PSPREG401C Exercise regulatory powers

Overview of evidence requirements 

In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:

• the knowledge requirements of this unit
• the skill requirements of this unit
• application of the Employability Skills as they relate to this unit (see Employability Summaries in Qualifications Framework)
• government security risk analysis in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)

Resources required to carry out assessment 

These resources include:

• legislation, policy, procedures and protocols relating to government security management
• organisational standards and documentation
• tools and methods used in the organisation for security risk analysis
• case studies and workplace scenarios to capture the range of situations likely to be encountered when undertaking government security risk analysis

Where and how to assess evidence 

Valid assessment of this unit requires:

• a workplace environment or one that closely resembles normal work practice and replicates the range of conditions likely to be encountered when undertaking government security risk analysis, including coping with difficulties, irregularities and breakdowns in routine
• government security risk analysis in a range of (3 or more) contexts (or occasions, over time)

Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:

• people with disabilities
• people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds
• Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
• women
• young people
• older people
• people in rural and remote locations

Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:

• case studies
• portfolios
• projects
• questioning
• scenarios
• simulation or role plays
• authenticated evidence from the workplace and/or training courses, such as security risk register

For consistency of assessment 

Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments

The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics  in the Performance Criteria is explained here.

Strategic context  may include:

• the relationship between the organisation and the environment in which it operates
• organisational structure
• the organisation's functions:

• political
• operational
• financial
• social
• legal
• commercial

• the various stakeholders and clients

Organisational context  may include:

• the organisation, how it is organised, and its capabilities
• any official resources, including physical areas and assets, that are vital to the operation of the organisation
• key operational elements of the organisation
• any major projects

Stakeholders  may include:

• all those individuals and groups both inside and outside the organisation that have some direct interest in the organisation's behaviour, actions, products and services such as:

• employees at all levels of the organisation
• community
• clients
• other public sector organisations
• union and association representatives
• boards of management
• government
• Ministers

Legislation, policy and procedures  may include

• Commonwealth and State/Territory legislation including equal employment opportunity, occupational health and safety, privacy and anti-discrimination law
• national and international codes of practice and standards
• the organisation's policies and practices
• government policy
• codes of conduct/codes of ethics
• Australian Government Information Security Manual (ISM)
• Protective Security Policy Framework
• AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management - Principles and Guidelines

Security risk criteria  may concern:

• vital functions and capabilities
• the expectations of stakeholders and clients
• the personal security of employees and clients
• general expectations about confidentiality
• the availability of the organisation's official resources

Risk  may be to:

• personnel
• information
• property
• reputation

Sources of security risk  may include:

• technical
• actual events
• political circumstances
• human behaviour
• environmental
• conflict
• terrorism
• internal
• external
• local
• national
• international

Specified methodology or tools  may be:

• qualitative and/or semi-quantitative and/or quantitative
• brainstorming
• focus groups
• expert judgment
• strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis
• analysis of risk registers
• examination of available data such as audit results, incident reports
• nomogram
• risk matrix
• scenario analysis
• business continuity planning

Threat assessment :

• is used to provide information about people and events that may pose a threat to a particular resource or function
• evaluates and discusses the likelihood of a threat being realised
• determines the potential of a threat to actually cause harm

Threats  may be:

• criminal
• terrorist
• from foreign intelligence services
• from commercial/industrial competitors
• from malicious people
• real or perceived

Risk exposure  is:

• a measure of how open a resource is to harm, or
• the potential of a resource to attract harm

Likelihood  of risk may be determined through analysis of:

• current controls to deter, detect or prevent harm
• effectiveness of current controls
• level of exposure
• threat assessment
• determination of threat source/s
• competence/capability of threat source/s
• opportunity for threat to occur

Consequences  may include:

• degree of harm
• who would be affected and how
• how much disruption would occur
• damage to:

• the organisation
• other organisations
• government
• third parties

Critical lead time  for recovery is:

• the period of time a function is compromised
• critical if the function is vital to the organisation

Risk ratings  may include:

• severe
• high
• major
• significant
• moderate
• low
• trivial

Security risk register  may include:

• source
• nature
• existing controls
• likelihood
• consequences
• initial rating
• vulnerability