Modification History
Not applicable.
Unit Descriptor
Unit Descriptor |
This unit covers the knowledge and skills required to promote evidence-based approaches to crime prevention initiatives. The integration of evidence from research and experience in crime prevention can be used to inform policy and program development, implementation and evaluation of initiatives. Crime prevention requires decision making that is based on the best available evidence and experience applied in the local context. |
Application of the Unit
Application of the Unit |
This unit supports the attainment of skills and knowledge required for competent workplace performance in councils of all sizes. Knowledge of the legislation and regulations within which councils must operate is essential. The unique nature of councils, as a tier of government directed by elected members and reflecting the needs of local communities, must be appropriately reflected. |
Licensing/Regulatory Information
Not applicable.
Pre-Requisites
Prerequisite Unit /s |
Employability Skills Information
Employability Skills |
This unit contains employability skills. |
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
Elements describe the essential outcomes of a Unit of Competency |
Performance criteria describe the required performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the Required Skills and Knowledge and/or the Range Statement. Assessment of performance is to be consistent with the Evidence Guide. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Integrate evidence-based approaches into professional practice |
1.1. Sources of information on crime prevention theories and best practice principles are located efficiently and critically analysed in order to inform decision making. 1.2. Information technologies that can enhance the effective use of data in decision making are actively sought and used. 1.3. Data collection and information generating practices, implemented as part of local crime prevention initiatives, are critically examined to assess the quality of information available to inform decision making. 1.4. Existing evidence from research and experience is critically appraised for its validity and usefulness to decision making in crime prevention practices. 1.5. Plans for the design, implementation and evaluation of crime prevention initiatives reflect the systematic and effective integration of the best available evidence to support the chosen course of action. |
2. Foster the use of evidence-based approaches in crime prevention |
2.1. Agreements in relation to the resource requirements of evidence-based practices that support the development of crime prevention policies and initiatives are negotiated, in line with resource availability. 2.2. Obstacles or restrictions to the acceptance of evidence-based approaches to crime prevention practice are identified and addressed. 2.3. Networks are developed and maintained to support the dissemination of accurate information about crime prevention. 2.4. Strategies to encourage the adoption and integration of evidence-based approaches to crime prevention practices are developed. |
3. Use research and practitioners' experience to promote evidence-based practice in crime prevention |
3.1. Systematic reviews and analyses of crime prevention information and research literature are undertaken in order to identify new areas where research activity is warranted. 3.2. Collaborative partnerships are sought to facilitate the development of research initiatives that address identified areas of need. 3.3. Practices based on the experience of practitioners are actively encouraged and evaluated for their effectiveness. 3.4. Opportunities within influential networks for the public dissemination and discussion of issues relating to crime prevention research and evaluation are actively sought and utilised. |
Hidden text |
Required Skills and Knowledge
REQUIRED SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE |
This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit |
Required Skills |
|
Required Knowledge |
|
Hidden text |
Evidence Guide
EVIDENCE GUIDE |
|
Overview of assessment requirements |
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit will be able to perform the outcomes described in the Elements to the required performance level detailed in the Performance Criteria. The knowledge and skill requirements described in the Range Statement must also be demonstrated. For example, knowledge of the legislative framework and safe work practices that underpin the performance of the unit are also required to be demonstrated. |
Critical aspects of evidence to be considered |
Demonstrated ability to:
|
Context of assessment |
Competency is demonstrated by performance of all stated criteria applicable to the workplace environment, within the scope of the Range Statement. Assessment must take account of the endorsed Assessment Guidelines in the relevant Training Package. Evidence is best gathered through a holistic assessment activity that integrates the elements of competency. Assessment should reinforce the integration of the key competencies as indicated at the end of this unit. Formative assessments may be conducted off the job and/or in simulated work environments. However, summative assessment of this unit of competency must be undertaken in an actual setting and preferably in conjunction with normal crime prevention activities. Evidence must be from an actual setting and is to be gathered by direct observation or supervisor report of consultation and liaison in context, and by examining a portfolio. The portfolio should contain detailed reports of the application of evidence-based approaches within daily work practices, and the promotion of evidence-based approaches to others. |
Relationship to other units (prerequisite or co-requisite units ) |
This unit may be assessed independently or in conjunction with: CHCP&R5A Manage research activities. |
Method of assessment |
The following assessment methods are suggested:
|
Evidence required for demonstration of consistent performance |
Evidence of competency should be gathered over time in a range of actual or simulated workplace situations and involving a combination of direct and indirect forms of supplementary evidence. Substantiation of prior performance may be sought from supervisors and peers within the workplace or from others who are able to provide reliable and substantiated evidence regarding the candidate's prior performance. |
Resource implications |
This unit involves workplace-based activity. The resources should relate specifically to the organisation or community's policies, guidelines, requirements, resources and equipment and may include:
|
Range Statement
RANGE STATEMENT |
|
The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below. |
|
Sources of information may be internal or external to the practitioner's organisation or agency and could include : |
|
Crime prevention theories may include : |
|
Best practice principles may include : |
|
Data collection and information generating practices may include : |
|
Existing evidence can include data generated from processes such as : |
|
Resource requirements may relate to : |
|
Obstacles or restrictions may include : |
|
Networks may include : |
|
Strategies that are targeted and tailored to promote communication may include : |
|
Collaborative partnerships may include those individuals , groups and organisations who have : |
|
Compliance with occupational health and safety (OHS ) legislation , codes of practice , public safety considerations and enterprise procedures may include : |
|
Hidden text |
Unit Sector(s)
Unit Sector |
Regulatory Services Units |
Hidden text |
Competency field
Competency Field |
co-requisite unit/s
Co-requisite Unit /s |