Modification History
Unit revised and not equivalent to CPPSIS5015A Undertake spatial process improvement to reduce costs and improve service
Element structure, performance criteria, and critical aspects reviewed to reflect workplace requirements
References to sustainability strengthened
Skills and knowledge requirements and the range statement updated
Unit Descriptor
This unit of competency specifies the outcomes required to undertake continuous improvement in the review of organisational work processes and guidelines. This includes encouraging all staff to consider and be open to continuous improvement. It requires highly-developed communication and negotiation skills and the ability to apply skills and knowledge to a wide variety of spatial contexts with substantial depth to provide scope for spatial knowledge management. Function would be carried out within organisational guidelines.
Application of the Unit
This unit of competency supports the application of theoretical and practical analysis; organisational, very sound communication, negotiation and problem-solving skills; the ability to demonstrate initiative and enterprise; and an understanding of technology. The skills and knowledge acquired upon completion of this unit would support the needs of employees in surveying, cartography, town planning, mapping or geographic information systems.
Licensing/Regulatory Information
No licensing, legislative and regulatory requirements apply to this unit at the time of endorsement.
Pre-Requisites
Nil
Employability Skills Information
This unit contains employability skills.
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
Elements describe the essential outcomes of a unit of competency. |
Performance criteria describe the required performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the required skills and knowledge and/or the range statement. Assessment of performance is to be consistent with the evidence guide. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 |
Identify opportunities for process change. |
1.1 |
Processes are monitored to ensure that they are cost-effective, customer focused, error free and achieve the planned result. |
1.2 |
Problems are identified and communicated to relevant personnel to improve service and prevent recurrence, according to organisational guidelines . |
||
1.3 |
Using organisational guidelines, error analysis of the process is conducted to identify where practices could be improved. |
||
1.4 |
Inconsistencies are identified by comparing processes for similar tasks to ensure the most effective method is being used. |
2 |
Encourage development of ideas for improvement. |
2.1 |
Ideas for improvement are given prompt consideration and feedback to maximise possible benefits and compliance with relevant legislation . |
2.2 |
An environment where improvements are sought and rewarded is maintained and incentives are offered. |
||
2.3 |
Relevant personnel are coached through the review of ideas to ensure commitment to solutions. |
3 |
Assess viability of new ideas. |
3.1 |
Ideas are discussed and evaluated with operators and against existing practices, precedents and legislative or organisational restrictions to determine viability and compliance. |
3.2 |
Contribution of the ideas to service quality improvement , quality assurance , risk assessment or cost efficiency is identified. |
||
3.3 |
Application of correct OHS practices within the ideas is ensured. |
||
3.4 |
Balanced judgements are made on the effectiveness of ideas. |
4 |
Develop alternatives for process improvement. |
4.1 |
Relevant personnel and area specialists are involved so that all aspects of the process can be considered. |
4.2 |
Regular opportunities are provided to relevant personnel to consider alternative approaches to process improvement. |
5 |
Implement viable change. |
5.1 |
Support is provided to employees to facilitate cultural change . |
5.2 |
Change is monitored regularly to ensure anticipated benefits are realised. |
||
5.3 |
All areas affected by change are advised promptly to minimise disruption and ensure commitment. |
||
5.4 |
Continued improvement is encouraged and documentation on improvement processes is maintained according to organisational guidelines. |
Required Skills and Knowledge
This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
Required skills
Required knowledge
|
Evidence Guide
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, the range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for this Training Package. |
|
Overview of assessment |
This unit of competency could be assessed on its own or in combination with other units relevant to the job function, for example CPPSIS5042A Maintain effective internal and external spatial communication networks. |
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit |
A person who demonstrates competency in this unit must be able to provide theoretical and practical evidence of:
|
Specific resources for assessment |
Resource implications for assessment include access to:
Access must be provided to appropriate learning and assessment support when required. Where applicable, physical resources should include equipment modified for people with disabilities. |
Context of assessment |
Holistic: based on the performance criteria, evidence guide, range statement, and required skills and knowledge. |
Method of assessment |
Demonstrated over a period of time and observed by the assessor (or assessment team working together to conduct the assessment). Demonstrated competency in a range of situations, that may include customer/workplace interruptions and involvement in related activities normally experienced in the workplace. Obtained by observing activities in the field and reviewing induction information. If this is not practicable, observation in realistic simulated environments may be substituted. |
Guidance information for assessment |
Assessment requires that the clients’ objectives and industry expectations are met. If the clients’ objectives are narrowly defined or not representative of industry needs, it may be necessary to refer to portfolio case studies of a variety of SIS requirements to assess competency. Oral questioning or written assessment and hypothetical situations (scenarios) may be used to assess underpinning knowledge (in assessment situations where the candidate is offered a preference between oral questioning or written assessment, questions are to be identical). Supplementary evidence may be obtained from relevant authenticated correspondence from existing supervisors, team leaders or specialist training staff. All practical demonstration must adhere to the safety and environmental regulations relevant to each State or Territory. Where assessment is for the purpose of recognition (recognition of current competencies [RCC] or recognition of prior learning [RPL]), the evidence provided will need to be authenticated and show that it represents competency demonstrated over a period of time. In all cases where practical assessment is used it will be combined with targeted questioning to assess the underpinning knowledge. Assessment processes will be appropriate to the language and literacy levels of the candidate and any cultural issues that may affect responses to the questions, and will reflect the requirements of the competency and the work being performed. |
Range Statement
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the performance criteria is detailed below. Add any essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts. |
|
Processes may include: |
|
Problems may include: |
|
Relevant personnel may include: |
|
Organisational guidelines may include: |
|
Error analysis may include: |
|
Inconsistencies may include: |
|
Ideas may require: |
|
Legislation refers to relevant state, territory and federal Acts, including: |
|
Incentives may include: |
|
Spatial service quality improvement may include: |
|
Quality assurance may include: |
|
Risk assessment may include the chance of something happening that will have an impact upon objectives. It is measured in terms of: |
|
OHS may include: |
|
Area specialists are parties involved in process change, including: |
|
Support may include: |
|
Cultural change refers to: |
|
Documentation may include: |
|
Unit Sector(s)
Not applicable.
Custom Content Section
Not applicable.