Assessment Requirements for PMBTECH406 Diagnose production equipment problems

Release: 1

Assessment Requirements for PMBTECH406 Diagnose production equipment problems

Modification History

Release 1. Supersedes and is equivalent to PMBTECH406A Diagnose production equipment problems

Performance Evidence

Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria and demonstrate the ability to:

read and interpret test results, technical information, product specifications, instruments/control panels, material labels and safety data sheets (SDS)

examine products/process to identify faults via one (1) or more of:

visual examination

examination of product quality or other records

examination of inspection records

examination of test results

specific examination testing undertaken as part of a product improvement activity

analyse the faults to identify all feasible causes of the problem

investigate possible causes to short list probable causes including one (1) or more of:

talking with operators and others

checking machine histories for prevailing process conditions

checking current process/equipment conditions

carrying out small tests to determine the likelihood of a causal link between a condition and a fault

confirm most probable cause based on available data

develop and communicate solution to the fault which meets safety requirements

monitor implementation of the solution and review and make adjustments as required

communicate effectively with team/work group and supervisors

complete workplace records

document updates to procedures

write equipment/process condition specifications.

Knowledge Evidence

Must provide evidence that demonstrates knowledge relevant to their job sufficient to fulfil their job role including knowledge of:

how the process/equipment works

characteristics of materials and their behaviour in relation to process conditions and stages of production

impact of variations process conditions on the product

impacts of equipment failure/change/variation on the product

changes to materials at various stages of production

quality/inspection/testing regime and relationship of results of to process conditions and equipment faults

types of product faults, including variations in:

colour

surface finish

size/shape

physical properties

chemical properties

biological/biochemical/microbiological properties

types of process/equipment condition problems, including:

settings, such as temperature and pressure

rates, such as feed rate and flow rate

setting and adjustment of equipment parts

worn and broken equipment parts

product faults that can be caused by process/equipment problems and possible solutions

organisation procedures relevant to the work environment/job role

hierarchy of control

hazards that may arise in the job/work environment and:

their possible causes

potential consequences

appropriate risk controls.

Assessment Conditions

The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence shall be based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.

The diagnosis and solving of a number of faults with different types of causes is required, including:

product defect with process condition cause

product defect with equipment problem cause

process fault/problem with process condition or equipment cause.

The collection of performance evidence is best done from a report and/or folio of evidence drawn from:

a single project which provides sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria

multiple smaller projects which together provide sufficient evidence of the requirements of all the elements and performance criteria.

A third-party report, or similar, may be needed to testify to the work done by the individual, particularly when the project has been done as part of a project team.

Assessment should use a real project in an operational workplace. Where this is not possible or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors assessment must occur using a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment that reflects realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.

Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from demonstration of skills and one or more of:

walk-throughs

pilot plant operation

industry-based case studies/scenarios

‘what ifs’.

Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews.

Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.

Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.

The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.

Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.

Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.

In addition the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment shall demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they shall assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.

Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:

relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment

appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions

appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions

Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:

being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed

being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures

having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment

conducting on the job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed

being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.

Links

Companion Volume implementation guides are found in VETNet - https://vetnet.gov.au/Pages/TrainingDocs.aspx?q=932aacef-7947-4c80-acc6-593719fe4090