Modification History
PUAEMR008B Release 2: Layout adjusted. Content reviewed.
PUAEMR008B Release 1: Primary release.
Unit Descriptor
This unit describes the outcomes required to participate in working groups or other forums that contribute to developing an emergency risk assessment and treatment plan for a community.
The emergency risk management process used will be developed in close cooperation with the community and consistent with the National Emergency Risk Assessment Guidelines.
No licencing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication.
Application of the Unit
This unit applies to workers who undertake emergency risk assessments with a community or part of a community. Such assessments are conducted at local, regional or state level by local governments, emergency management committees, public safety agencies, major event managers or other organisations that need to understand emergency risk to a community.
This unit is relevant to individuals with specific expertise who may be invited to participate in an emergency risk assessment working group.
Licensing/Regulatory Information
Not applicable.
Pre-Requisites
Not applicable.
Employability Skills Information
This unit contains employability skills.
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
|
Elements describe the essential outcomes of a Unit of Competency. |
Performance Criteria describe the required performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the Range Statement. Assessment of performance is to be consistent with the Evidence Guide. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
|
ELEMENT |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
|
1 Clarify the community context |
1.1 Information about known risks , safety concerns, expectations and desired outcomes is collected and analysed. 1.2 Safety concerns, drivers , recent events, community views and sensitivities are identified. 1.3 Relevant legislation, policies, procedures and existing emergency management documentation and arrangements are identified. 1.4 Input to building an initial picture of community characteristics, safety expectations and perceptions of risk is provided. 1.5 Significance of available information for own organisation/constituency is assessed and reported. 1.6 Scope and focus of a feasible emergency risk management project are determined. |
|
2 Apply the emergency risk management methodology |
2.1 Own role, organisational responsibilities, limits of authority, scope of community knowledge and expertise are outlined to other group members. 2.2 Organisational resources that can be provided to support the emergency risk management process are identified. 2.3 Sources of useful, credible information are identified through stakeholders , community networks and interested parties. 2.4 Practical consultation, communication and decision making strategies are agreed. 2.5 Processes for accountability and timely communication of accurate, consistent information to stakeholders are developed. |
|
3 Develop risk statements and treatment options |
3.1 Credibility, accuracy and currency of available risk information is assessed. 3.2 Additional information is sought from specialists, organisations and other stakeholders regarding information gaps and conflicting data or views. 3.3 Risk statements are jointly developed by considering sources of risk, elements at risk and vulnerability. 3.4 Risk statements are jointly analysed by considering the consequences and likelihood of occurrences. 3.5 Input is provided to help assess the effectiveness of existing treatment strategies. 3.6 Treatment options for risks are suggested that take into account implications for stakeholders, practical constraints and established assessment criteria. 3.7 Feedback on risks and treatment options is obtained from own organisation/constituency and other stakeholders. 3.8 Recommendations are jointly developed and submitted for approval. |
|
4 Promote ownership for the process and outcomes |
4.1 Comprehensive consultation is undertaken at all stages. 4.2 All positions and commitments are properly authorised before being communicated to others. 4.3 Management is kept informed of project progress, proposed variations in strategy, decisions and recommendations. 4.4 Variations to commitment of resources are negotiated with management. 4.5 All stages of the process, decisions and outcomes are documented in accordance with accountability, legislative, regulatory and organisational requirements. 4.6 Opportunities for improving emergency risk management processes are reported. |
|
5 Work cooperatively with other participants and stakeholders |
5.1 Commitment is demonstrated by sharing knowledge and expertise, completing allocated tasks on time and encouraging others to help achieve common goals. 5.2 Meeting procedures are observed. 5.3 Accurate information is provided at all times. 5.4 Opinions and advice are contributed while appreciating the boundaries and cultures of organisations and diverse views of other participants. 5.5 A wide range of reactions and views are actively sought. 5.6 Language used in meetings is appropriate to the broad range of participants. 5.7 Confidentiality and sensitivity of information and meeting processes are respected. 5.8 Conflicts are resolved constructively with a minimum of fuss. 5.9 Overall community safety outcomes are placed above personal or organisational/constituency interests. |
Required Skills and Knowledge
|
This describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
|
Required Skills |
|
|
Required Knowledge |
|
Evidence Guide
|
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit |
Assessment must confirm the ability to:
Consistency in performance Competency should be demonstrated in a range of contexts throughout the life of a community emergency risk management project, or during components of a number of projects. |
|
Context of and specific resources for assessment |
Context of assessment Competency should be assessed participating in a group emergency risk management process and contributing to the joint development of a set of recommendations that address community safety in the workplace. Assessment is commonly undertaken in the context of an action learning project on-the-job. Specific resources for assessment Access to a community and the opportunity to contribute to an actual emergency risk management process and consider a range of community safety concerns. |
|
Guidance information for assessment |
This unit contains many transferrable skills, such as communication, consultation, research and analysis skills that can be applied in the emergency risk management context. Assessors should use formative assessment strategies in a simulated environment to contextualise underpinning knowledge. Summative assessment requires application of the unit in a real-life project, often in an action-learning context. |
Range Statement
|
The Range Statement relates to the Unit of Competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording in the Performance Criteria is detailed below. |
|
|
Information may include: |
|
|
Known risks may include: |
|
|
Drivers may include: |
|
|
Legislation, policies and procedures may include: |
|
|
Sources of useful, credible information may include: |
|
|
Stakeholders may include: |
|
|
Treatment options may include: |
|
|
Practical constraints may include: |
|
Unit Sector(s)
Not applicable.
