Modification History
Release |
TP Version |
Comments |
3 |
PSP12V1 |
Unit descriptor edited. |
2 |
PSP04V4.2 |
Layout adjusted. No changes to content. |
1 |
PSP04V4.1 |
Primary release. |
Unit Descriptor
This unit covers the activities required to undertake strategic analysis and detection of corruption or fraudulent activities. It includes hypothesising fraud and corruption situations, initiating projects to test newly identified risk areas, analysing trends in fraud and corruption activities and investigations, recommending courses of action and providing information on recommended actions.
Fraud in the unit title incorporates both fraud and corruption.
In practice, anticipating and detecting possible fraud and corruption activity may overlap with other generalist or specialist public sector workplace activities such as acting ethically, promoting compliance with legislation, delivering client services, conducting fraud and corruption risk assessment, etc.
This unit replaces and is equivalent to PSPFRAU502A Anticipate and detect possible fraud activity.
No licensing, legislative, regulatory or certification requirements apply to this unit at the time of publication
Application of the Unit
Not applicable.
Licensing/Regulatory Information
Not applicable.
Pre-Requisites
Not applicable.
Employability Skills Information
This unit contains employability skills.
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
Elements are the essential outcomes of the unit of competency. |
Together, performance criteria specify the requirements for competent performance. Text in bold italics is explained in the Range Statement following. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1 . Hypothesise fraud and corruption situations |
1.1 Hypotheses are formulated and guidelines specified for input into information system design. 1.2 Data and information is collected from a variety of sources and methods including fraud/corruption records, audit records, fraud/corruption risk assessment, past investigations and other organisations. 1.3 Hypothetical fraud and corruption situations are used to identify new potential risk areas. |
2 . Initiate projects to test newly identified risk areas |
2.1 New projects are initiated and parameters defined in accordance with fraud/corruption control plan. 2.2 Significance and value of the project are justified and are consistent with the fraud/corruption control strategy and plan and strategy. 2.3 Previous and ongoing activities in the relevant areas are reviewed for their contributions to the outcomes of the project. 2.4 Project activities are designed utilising current knowledge, methods and techniques for the identification of risks. |
3 . Analyse trends in fraud and corruption activities and investigations |
3.1 All project and investigation outcomes are reviewed to identify emerging patterns of behaviour reflected in data. 3.2 Conclusions are drawn from data and statistical information as well as qualitative sources including information gathered and reports from previous investigations. 3.3 Risks and strengths are identified as a result of a project's analysis of trends inside and outside the organisation. 3.4 Discussion with colleagues and other experienced organisational staff is used as additional source of information on trends. 3.5 Networks are used to provide useful contacts and information for investigation in accordance with legislative requirements. 3.6 Performance reports are produced which identify trends in fraud and corruption activities and investigations. |
4 . Recommend course /s of action |
4.1 All relevant elements are considered during evaluation , prior to recommending course of action . 4.2 Investigation targets are identified, and suggestions for future areas of investigation are referred to management. 4.3 Recommendations are made for changes to organisational controls and initiatives to target potential trouble spots. 4.4 Data is checked for reliability, and practical recommendations are made providing management with feasible options. 4.5 Management issues and concerns are balanced against public interest and political concerns when framing recommendations. 4.6 Recommendations are made that balance operational demands against contributions to strategic plan. |
5 . Provide information on recommended actions |
5.1 Reports are provided containing suggestions for actions and sufficient supporting information for management to adequately resource future projects. 5.2 Advice is provided regarding appropriate controls and initiatives required to address fraud and corruption. 5.3 Operational briefings and other presentations are prepared and given as required. 5.4 Ad hoc opportunities to explain operational risks are taken advantage of, as they arise. 5.5 Information is given in terms that clearly explain the nature of possible risk, with possible solutions outlined. |
Required Skills and Knowledge
This section describes the essential skills and knowledge and their level, required for this unit. |
Skill requirements Look for evidence that confirms skills in:
|
Knowledge requirements Look for evidence that confirms knowledge and understanding of:
|
Evidence Guide
The Evidence Guide specifies the evidence required to demonstrate achievement in the unit of competency as a whole. It must be read in conjunction with the Unit descriptor, Performance Criteria, the Range Statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Public Sector Training Package. |
|
Units to be assessed together |
|
Overview of evidence requirements |
In addition to integrated demonstration of the elements and their related performance criteria, look for evidence that confirms:
|
Resources required to carry out assessment |
These resources include:
|
Where and how to assess evidence |
Valid assessment of this unit requires:
Assessment methods should reflect workplace demands, such as literacy, and the needs of particular groups, such as:
Assessment methods suitable for valid and reliable assessment of this competency may include, but are not limited to, a combination of 2 or more of:
|
For consistency of assessment |
Evidence must be gathered over time in a range of contexts to ensure the person can achieve the unit outcome and apply the competency in different situations or environments |
Range Statement
The Range Statement provides information about the context in which the unit of competency is carried out. The variables cater for differences between States and Territories and the Commonwealth, and between organisations and workplaces. They allow for different work requirements, work practices and knowledge. The Range Statement also provides a focus for assessment. It relates to the unit as a whole. Text in bold italics in the Performance Criteria is explained here. |
|
Methods used to anticipate or detect possible fraud and corruption may include: |
|
Identification of risks may come from: |
|
Projects may include: |
|
Legislative requirements may include: |
|
Evaluation criteria may include: |
|
Actions may include: |
|
Recommendations may include: |
|
Unit Sector(s)
Not applicable.
Competency field
Fraud Control.