Modification History
Not applicable.
Unit Descriptor
Unit descriptor |
This unit of competency covers the ability to perform scientific calculations, analyse trends and uncertainty in data and report results within the required timeframe. |
Application of the Unit
Application of the unit |
This unit of competency is applicable to technical officers and laboratory technicians working in all industry sectors. Industry representatives have provided case studies to illustrate the practical application of this unit of competency and to show its relevance in a workplace setting. These can be found at the end of this unit of competency under the section 'This competency in practice'. |
Licensing/Regulatory Information
Not applicable.
Pre-Requisites
Prerequisite units |
||
MSL924001A |
Process and interpret data |
|
Employability Skills Information
Employability skills |
This unit contains employability skills. |
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
Elements describe the essential outcomes of a unit of competency. |
Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Where bold italicised text is used, further information is detailed in the required skills and knowledge section and the range statement. Assessment of performance is to be consistent with the evidence guide. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
ELEMENT |
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA |
1. Perform scientific calculations |
1.1. Ensure raw data are consistent with expectations and reasonable ranges 1.2. Calculate scientific quantities involving algebraic, power, exponential and/or logarithmic functions 1.3. Ensure calculated quantities are consistent with estimations 1.4. Present results using the appropriate units, uncertainties and number of significant figures |
2. Analyse trends and relationships in data |
2.1. Determine linear and non-linear relationships between sets of data 2.2. Prepare and analyse control charts to determine if a process is in control 2.3. Identify possible causes for out-of-control condition 2.4. Follow enterprise procedures to return process to in-control operation |
3. Determine variation and/or uncertainty in data distributions |
3.1. Organise raw data into appropriate frequency distributions 3.2. Calculate means, medians, modes, ranges and standard deviations for ungrouped and grouped data 3.3. Interpret frequency distributions to determine the characteristics of the sample or population 3.4. Calculate standard deviations and confidence limits for means and replicates 3.5. Estimate the uncertainty in measurements using statistical analysis 3.6. Determine data acceptability using statistical tests and enterprise procedures |
4. Check for aberrant results |
4.1. Identify results that cannot be reconciled with sample, sample documentation, testing procedures and/or expected outcomes 4.2. Determine appropriate actions in consultation with supervisor as required |
5. Report results |
5.1. Use charts, tables and graphs to present results in the required format 5.2. Verify that entry of data and results are correct 5.3. Prepare reports in a format and style consistent with their intended use and enterprise guidelines 5.4. Communicate results within the specified time and in accordance with enterprise confidentiality and security guidelines |
Required Skills and Knowledge
REQUIRED SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE |
This section describes the skills and knowledge required for this unit. |
Required skills |
Required skills include:
|
Required knowledge |
Required knowledge includes:
|
Evidence Guide
EVIDENCE GUIDE |
|
The Evidence Guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, required skills and knowledge, range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package. |
|
Overview of assessment |
|
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit |
Assessors should ensure that candidates can:
|
Context of and specific resources for assessment |
This unit of competency is to be assessed in the workplace or simulated workplace environment. This unit of competency may be assessed with:
Resources may include:
|
Method of assessment |
The following assessment methods are suggested:
In all cases, practical assessment should be supported by questions to assess underpinning knowledge and those aspects of competency which are difficult to assess directly. Where applicable, reasonable adjustment must be made to work environments and training situations to accommodate ethnicity, age, gender, demographics and disability. Access must be provided to appropriate learning and/or assessment support when required. The language, literacy and numeracy demands of assessment should not be greater than those required to undertake the unit of competency in a work like environment. |
This competency in practice |
Industry representatives have provided the case studies below to illustrate the practical application of this unit of competency and to show its relevance in a workplace setting. Manufacturing Before pharmaceutical products can be approved for use in Australia, they must be tested for shelflife in their Australian sales packs. The shelf life of a preparation is the time of storage which results in a preparation becoming unfit for use, either through chemical decomposition of the active substances or physical deterioration of the preparation. Stability profiles are determined by storing the preparation under a range of temperature conditions and evaluating it at predetermined time intervals. For example, a technical assistant may be required to evaluate the physical parameters of the new tablet to detect any changes in its appearance, hardness, friability, disintegration and dissolution profile. The assistant regularly assays the tablets using a stability indicating assay. The results are plotted and the information gained is used to predict the period of time for which the tablets will meet the appropriate standards for physical characteristics, purity and potency when stored under defined conditions. Biomedical Supplementation of vitamins and minerals in the diet as a means to avert a clinical problem is a popular area of research, linking epidemiological and clinical investigation with food analyses. In the example of folate, such combined studies have led to the fortification of a number of foods and the requirement for folate supplementation for women of child bearing age. A typical project team would involve medical staff, a dietician and a scientific or technical officer to perform the assays. One possible line of study is to control the level of supplementation for the person and introduce the micronutrient in a dose form over and above that given in a controlled baseline diet. Blood samples would be collected and the serum micronutrient levels assayed. The technical officer would be responsible for keeping the statistical quality control data and analysing the assays. The technical officer would work with the research team to correlate the serum levels with the dose input. To contribute effectively, the technical officer must understand the significance of the relationships between collected test data and the controlled experimental variables. Food processing A state government analytical laboratory recently performed comparative assays of (-carotene using ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) spectrometric and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) techniques. In any procedure where the assay is to be replaced, side by side analyses must be performed on multiple samples and the correlations between the data compared statistically. The two procedures are then developed or modified for local laboratories and a routine procedure developed. At this point, technical officers would assay the samples by the two methods. They would ensure that all procedures were followed with close attention to quality control. Precision would be assessed through frequent assays of the same samples. Sensitivity of the assay would be assessed by performing the assay over a range of sample concentrations. The technical officers would carefully document the procedures and record all data for later validation. They may also provide preliminary graphical representations of data for their supervisor. |
Range Statement
RANGE STATEMENT |
|
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. Essential operating conditions that may be present with training and assessment (depending on the work situation, needs of the candidate, accessibility of the item, and local industry and regional contexts) may also be included. |
|
Codes of practice |
Where reference is made to industry codes of practice, and/or Australian/international standards, it is expected the latest version will be used |
Standards , codes , procedures and /or enterprise requirements |
Standards, codes, procedures and/or enterprise requirements may include:
|
Data records |
Data records may include:
|
Scientific and technical terminology |
Scientific and technical terminology may include:
|
Laboratory computations |
Laboratory computations may include:
|
Calculations of scientific quantities |
Calculations of scientific quantities may include:
|
Graphical analysis |
Graphical analysis may include:
|
Calculations |
Calculations may be performed:
|
Statistical analysis |
Statistical analysis may include the use of:
|
Records |
Records may include information associated with:
|
Occupational health and safety (OHS ) and environmental management requirements |
OHS and environmental management requirements:
|
Unit Sector(s)
Unit sector |
Data |
Competency field
Competency field |
Co-requisite units
Co-requisite units |
||